India probing Netflix for visa violations, racial discrimination, email shows

India is investigating the industry practices of U.S. streaming extensive Netflix’s local operations, including allegations of visa violations and racial discrimination, according to a executive email sent to a customary executive.

The principle points of India’s investigation were incorporated in a July 20 email, reviewed by Reuters, which used to be written by a home ministry legitimate to Netflix’s customary director of industry and factual affairs for India, Nandini Mehta, who left the corporate in 2020.

“This is concerning visa and tax violations concerns concerning the industry practices of Netflix in India,” wrote Indian legitimate Deepak Yadav from the Foreigners Regional Registration Region of job (FRRO) of the dwelling ministry in Unique Delhi.

“Now we contain obtained obvious minute print on this regard w.r.t (with respect to) the said company’s conduct, visa violation, unlawful structures, tax evasion and other malpractices including incidents of racial discrimination that company has been engaged in while conducting its industry in India,” he added.

In an emailed statement, Mehta acknowledged she is pursuing a lawsuit in U.S. against Netflix for alleged wrongful termination apart from to racial and gender discrimination – costs the corporate denies.

Mehta acknowledged she welcomed the Indian investigation and hopes the authorities fabricate their findings public, nonetheless did no longer account for on the allegations made by the chief.

Yadav declined to comment, asserting he used to be no longer authorized to command to media. The FRRO and India’s home ministry did no longer answer to Reuters queries.

A Netflix spokesperson acknowledged the corporate used to be “blind to an investigation by the Indian executive.”

The Indian legitimate’s email presentations rising scrutiny of Netflix in India, the do it has roughly 10 million customers and which it considers a boost market the do corporations purpose affluent folk in the nation of 1.4 billion folk.

Over the years, the US streaming extensive has developed extra local explain featuring Bollywood actors.

It has also usually confronted warmth in India over its explain deemed insensitive by some customers. This month, it used to be compelled so as to add novel disclaimers to an Indian sequence about a plane hijack after social media outrage and executive anger over what they acknowledged used to be Muslim hijackers being shown as Hindus.

SEEKING DOCUMENTS, US LAWSUIT

While it is recognized that Netflix has since 2023 confronted an Indian tax ask – which it is no longer easy – the existence of a broader investigation into allegations including visa compliance and racial discrimination has no longer been previously reported.

The Indian executive’s email did no longer account for which agencies are attempting at disorders referring to Netflix. The FRRO works closely with home ministry’s Intelligence Bureau, the domestic intelligence company, and is the principle company attempting into foreigners’ visa compliance and permissions to consult with so-called “sensitive” regions.

Closing year, India accused Chinese smartphone player Vivo and its Indian affiliates for breaching visa options by visiting obvious “sensitive” regions without permission. India classifies substances of obvious states equivalent to Jammu & Kashmir in north and Sikkim in east as restricted areas.

The FRRO also acts as a liaison in issues related to foreigners with other executive offices.

Mehta worked on the corporate’s Los Angeles and Mumbai offices from April 2018 to April 2020, her LinkedIn profile presentations.

The Indian executive email asked her to variety “minute print/documents” as she used to be a customary factual executive of the corporate.

In 2021, Mehta sued Netflix in Los Angeles County Superior Court docket in California for alleged wrongful termination and racial and gender discrimination, amongst other issues, US court filings sing.

Netflix has in US court denied “each and each allegation” and acknowledged in its statement that Mehta used to be fired for time and again the use of her corporate bank card for tens of hundreds of bucks in internal most costs.

Mehta acknowledged she will “continue to wrestle for justice.” Her case is determined for a standing listening to on Monday in Los Angeles.